The story of a deadly attack against humanity and
against the environment and the resistance of a people against this aggression
Overview of the Tia Maria project
Nature of the project.
The Tia Maria
project is a poly metallic mining project, with copper as dominant metal, based
on open pit mining. Mineral processing, follows the conventional treatment for
this type of mine, reduction to powder of mineral (crushed) leaching in acidic
solution (sulfuric acid solution), refining, extraction by organic solvent,
concentration of the solution and obtaining of metallic copper by electrolysis
(metallic copper is fixed on the electrodes). The project is expected to
produce 120,000 tons of copper per year.
Like all
mining projects will be very impactful on the environment, remember that the
production of each ton of copper consumes about 450 kilos of explosives based
on ammonium nitrate (highly polluting), 150-200 m3 of water and requires
removal of 3,000 tons of rock (100,000 tons displaced each day) after treatment
those thousands of tons end up in the tailings deposits and will become a
permanent source of contamination. Another key factor is the consumption of
electricity for the electrolysis, each ton of copper consumes 250KWh
Another
feature of the project will be the installation of a seawater desalination
plant, required by the limited availability of fresh water in the region, this unit
is itself an environmental problem because this type of installation requires a
lot of energy and produces a large amount of brine (salt water waste high salt
concentration), energy is estimated at 5 kWh per m3, the plant must provide
60,000 m3 / day, which will be a very large plant, among the largest in the
world
Project
status.
The project
consists of two open pits (Tia Maria, located in the Quebrada Cachullo and
Tapada located in the Pampa Yamayo), in fact, is the last place (the Tapada)
seems the most promising in terms of wealth mineral, however, the entire
project took the name of Tia Maria.
Without
presenting the same environmental risks as the Yanacocha or Conga mines located
directly in the headwaters basin, on the largest aquifers in northern Peru, the
Tia Maria project, by its location, above the valley of Tambo river 2 km below,
involves a high risk of contamination by seepage or runoff in case of heavy
rains (El Niño).
Financial details of the project.
The project
is owned by the Southern Peru Copper Corporation, a subsidiary at 84.6% of the
Mexican group Grupo Mexico.
Total
estimated investment: $ 1.4 billion
Estimated
number of jobs: 3,500 during the construction phase (1 year),
700 during the operational phase.
Expected
annual production: 120,000 tons, the production cost is estimated between $
2,000 and $ 2,500 per ton of copper, selling prices (May 2015): $ 6000 per ton,
a minimum annual profit (excluding amortization) of (6000-2500) X 120,000 = $
420 million. The first five years are taken into account the amortization of
investments, from the fifth year the Peruvian State can expect an income of $
120 million annually, half of this income will go to the department of Arequipa
as payment of "mining canon", about 60 million, which mainly go to
the city of Arequipa and it really will not help the thousands of Tambo Valley
farmers that are directly affected by the project.
Of course,
that all this is done, is necessary that Southern properly pay its taxes,
without trying to artificially inflate its production costs, such as it does
Yanacocha. With this income of $ 60 million (about 200 million soles), which
comes into their bags, the mayor of Arequipa, Alfredo Zegarra and the Regional
President Yamila Osorio Delgado, fully support the project.
Southern
already has other mines in Peru, Cuajone (about 180,000 tonnes of copper per
year), Toquepala (130,000 tons annually) and Ilo, where the company has a unit
of concentration, refining and electrolysis with a capacity of 250,000 tons per
year. The initial project for Tia Maria watched transporting ore to Ilo
(distance over 100 km).
The
Cuajone mine
Origin of the conflict
Southern
presented the first environmental impact study (EAI) in June 2009, the Peruvian
government then spent an advisory agreement with the United Nations Office for
Project monitoring (UNOPS). The UNOPS report seriously reworked the Southern
EAI, with no less than 138 observations. . (see link n°1 and link n°2).
Source ’UNOPS
Meanwhile
the residents of Valle del Tambo created a defense coalition and organized a
local consultation the 27 September 2009, in which 90% of the valley's
population was against the project.. (see link n°1 et link n°2).
Despite the failure of Southern EAI,
the government of Alan García wanted to launch the project and in 2010 tried to pressure UNOPS to review its
report (Note that the work of UNOPS, which is a consulting
office with the seal of the UN, was not free, it cost
$ 6 million (UNOPS hires experts worldwide and that is not free).
In March 2011 the Ministry of Energy and Mines rejected this report (and
its 138 observations, 3 of which involved particularly serious environmental
risks) and broke the contract with UNOPS (see link). However,
the report fell into the hands of a leader of the Front for the Defense of the
Tambo Valley, this fact provoked the anger of the farmers in the valley and
demonstrations resumed on March 16, 2011.
The police
did not hesitate to use firearms, April 4, Andrés Taype Choquepuma died by a
bullet in the chest, April 11, 3 people died from gunshot wounds, Aurelio
Huarca Puma Nestor Cerezo Patana and Miguel Angel Pino. Then strain fell to the
announcement of the suspension of the project. (See link
1 and link
2)
In November
2013, Southern returned with a new environmental impact study, which the
government of Ollanta Humala was officially validated in August 2014 (link).
Tambo population did not trust neither in Southern nor in government and
tension settled in Cocachacra and Islay. The December 19, 2013 in Cocachacra,
the Southern and the government organized together a public hearing, which
invited only the supporters of the project (link
1 and link
2), the opponents could not even go to the hearing, 4000 policemen were
there to deny them access, including 1,200 directly to block access to the
building where took place the "public" hearing (link).
However, the government decreed that the project received the "social
license" (link).
4000
policemen deployed in the province of Islay and in the streets of Cocachacra to
"protect" the public hearing
on Tia Maria project - in fact to prevent access of opponents.
In March
2015, Southern announced the start of the project, whose EAI was officially
accepted by the government in August 2014, the population of Tambo, who has
never accepted this project, resumed demonstrations.
The latest happenings.
In early
March 2015, the government talks about establishing dialogue meetings, this
"roundtable" is not a dialogue, its sole purpose is to serve the
interests of the government that wants to impose the project, whatever the
cost.
Demonstration
- central place of Arequipa
April 22 -
Victoriano Huayna Nina has just received a bullet in the thigh, he will die
shortly after, due to bleeding
In June, the
conflict intensity declines because the Tambo Valley farmers have to look at
their crops and in particular, must harvest rice. However, the conflict is not
over, as the government instead of seeking calm, undertakes a "witch
hunt" against the movement's leaders and against the mayors of the villages
of the Tambo valley. Pepe Julio Gutierrez, president of the Defence Front of Tambo Valley, one of the main protest
leaders, was sentenced to nine months in prison and detained at the
Penitentiary of Socabaya (link).
Pepe Julio Gutiérrez, at the time of
his arrest
Organization and resistance.
The
structuring of the fight against the mining project was established naturally,
in fact 80% of the Tambo valley
population are farmers, too, people have a long experience of the mining
presence in the region in particular they have a long experience of Southern
and know well the social and environmental irresponsibility of the company.
Also, villagers saw the collapse of agriculture in several valleys in the
region (including the valleys of the Locumba, Sama and Osmore rivers), all
these rivers have seen the drastic decline of their flow, by the combined
effects of global warming and mining , which not only consume astronomical
amounts of water, but also returns it contaminated and unusable.
For farmers
in the region, is necessary to choose between mining and farming, as such
coexistence it is impossible. Valley Tambo del is the last fertile and
productive valley in the region, one of the last oasis of greenery that
sustains 13,000 people.
Since the
first threats, ie in 2008, a front of defense was created , which later became
the FDVT (Defense Front of Tambo Valley), with the main objective of organizing
a consultation, the September 27, 2009, over 90% of valley residents voted
against the project, the government's refusal to consider this popular decision
led to the first demonstration on 27 and 28 October 2009. The Defense Front of
Tambo Valley is the backbone of the resistance, its members are mainly farmers
of the valley and its president Pepe Julio Gutiérrez heads it from the front
constitution in 2009.
It is
noteworthy that Pepe Julio Gutiérrez, received numerous threats and persecution
by the Peruvian government, allegations of corruption and an attack on December
2, 2010, which was the subject of an information of APRODEH (human rights
organization in Peru) and shared in France by the FIDH (link).
Today, he is in prison, sentenced to 9 months of detention for a corruption
case known as "las lentejas" in which he is accused of demanding
money to stop demonstrations against Southern and for an alleged flight risk, a
convenient news for Southern and government.
But the
opposition of farmers is unshakeable and the eventual departure of President of
FDVT not affect the mobilization as this conflict is not the case of one man,
it is an entire valley, whose population lives on agriculture, which strongly
denies to accept this mining project and as seen in the demonstrations on July
9 in Arequipa, his determination not weakened, at the contrary.
Smear campaigns, manipulation and
denigration in the media.
As in January
2014 against opponents of the Conga project, the great Peruvian media unleashed
a systematic campaign to discredit opponents of mining projects, the
"antimineros" or "anti-mining" the opposition to mining
projects officially became terrorists (link
1 and link
2).
One of the
leaders of the opposition to mining projects and founder of Tierra y Libertad,
the priest Marco Arana was described as the successor of Abimael Guzman,
founder of the Shining Path (link),
high clerical hierarchy excluded him from the Church (link
) should be mentioned that the highest authority of the Peruvian Church,
Cardinal Cipriani, Archbishop of Lima, is a shareholder of the mining company
Yanacocha, therefore, Marco Arana had been suspended from his priestly duties
since 2011, following his opposition to the Conga project.
Marco Arana
A real
"witch hunt" triggers against the leaders and the mayors of the
cities of Islay who participated or supported the protests. This is
particularly the case of the mayor of the municipality of Dean Valdivia, Jaime
de la Cruz, whose election was invalidated, and also they threaten him to four
years in prison for his opposition to Tia Maria (link).
Jaime de la Cruz
The press did
not hesitate to organize dirty tricks with the police, for example, in the case
of Antonio Coasaca Mamani, the police captured a farmer and placed by force in
his hand a pointed object, a photographer for the newspaper "El Correo de
Arequipa" was waiting to take a picture of Antonio with the object in his
hand and wrote an article with the argument:" the Tia Maria project
opponents are violent and armed ". However, in this case, a person was
filming the scene, the video turned into social networks and the scandal broke
(link).
Police
placed a sharp object in the hand of Antonio Coasaca Mamani
As in 2014,
the press accuses NGOs, which denounce the abuses and violence of the police,
of being anti-mining and financing terrorism. The campaign in the media reached
such a point that the European Union ambassador in Lima, Irene Horejs, had to
send a letter of protest to the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Peru (link and letter).
The national and international
support for the struggle of the people of Tambo Valley
Of course,
many expressions of support for the people of the province of Islay organized
in different places, despite the relative silence of the great international
media (for example, in France, nothing in the main national channels (TF1, A2
and FR3), Arte only spoke of the problem, simply returning what came out on
German television.
At the
national level, it should be noted, the support from the CUNARC (link)
and the peasant patrols (rondas campesinas), particularly those of Cajamarca
(living a similar dispute with the company Yanacocha), the CNA (National
Agrarian Confederation) (link),
the indigenous communities in the region of Puno and Cusco (link),
youth movements, who organized several demonstrations, some harshly repressed,
particularly in Lima (link)
and of course the support of some leftist political movements, such as Tierra y
Libertad and MAS and some members of Congress, such as Jorge Rimarachin (link)
and Veronika Mendoza.
Demonstration of support in Lima
Demonstration of support in Cusco.
International
support came from Belgium, France, Sweden, Italy, Spain, Germany, USA, we will
include, among others:
- The colloquium held in the French Senate on May 22, 2015, on the issue of extractive and devoted a large space to the events that occurred in the province of Islay (link).
- The letter to Ollanta Humala by 19 members of the Swedish Parliament of 29 May 2015.
- The open letter to Ollanta Humala co-signed by 300 intellectuals, including Noam Chomsky, of June 2, 2015 (link).
- The declaration of the International Network of trade union for Solidarity and struggles (laboursolidarity.org) of June 10, 2015, co-signed by more than hundred organizations worldwide (link 1 and link 2).
Welcoming delegates of Peru at the Orly airport - conference in the Senate
of France on May 22
Demonstration of support in Berlin, July 7.
The tragic consequences of the
Peruvian government's conflict management..
7 killed (4
in 2011 and 3 in 2015), that are the tragic consequences of the management of
this conflict by successive Peruvian governments. Behind these deaths, hundreds
of injured, some keep sequels or remain disabled for life, there are also
widows and orphans.
From north to south it is building
solidarity against mega-mining projects.
The
population of the Tambo Valley received the support of many national and
international organizations. Tia Maria as Conga is listed among the most
emblematic struggles against destructive megaprojects imposed by force.
All
organizations of Cajamarca which fought and continues to fight against the
Conga mining megaproject have supported the fight against the Tia Maria
project, FDAC (Environmental Defense Front of Cajamarca), farmer organizations
and peasant patrols, the CUNARC and the PIC (Plataforma Interinstitucional
Celendína).
Demonstration in Celendín on May 27
The Mamapachapa
Unanchan or banner of Mother Earth is the largest green flag in the world,
paraded in the streets of Lima in December 2014 during the summit of the
peoples, today, refers to the struggle of the people of the Tambo valley
.
Gradually,
the resistance is not longer only local but becomes a national resistance
movement. The government responds only with the bloody and brutal repression or
multiplying states of emergency. Against that, only a national and
international mobilization can force the government to retreat. The fight
against Conga project was the first having an international dimension, the
fight against Tia Maria project is the second.
Socio-environmental
liabilities and irresponsibility of Southern.
The owner company, Grupo Mexico.
In February
19, 2006, several extraction tunnels in the coal mine of Pasta de Conchos
(Coahuila, Mexico) collapsed after a gas explosion, 65 miners were buried. The
research showed strong negligence on mine safety (link)
Grupo Mexico
caused one of the worst environmental disasters in the State of Sonora in
Mexico, in a copper mine, on August 6, 2014, 40,000 m3 of tailings were
discharged into a tributary of the Rio Sonora that was totally contaminated on
a distance of more than 200 km, the accident also contaminated groundwater and
more than 300 wells were contaminated, a dramatic situation in this
particularly dry region (link).
By now the group evaded its responsibilities, helped in that by its proximity
to the Mexican government.
Contaminación del rio Sonora
In Spain, the
Group is involved in a dark case of irregularities in the award of the
Aznalcollar mine in Andalusia (link).
The group is
also involved in numerous violations of labor standards.
Southern the Peruvian subsidiary.
In 2007 the
measurements made in the Southern refinery plant in Ilo, showed that this plant
did not meet the emission standards. Discharges into the sea contained arsenic
levels eight times higher than the standards. Moreover, smoke emissions had
rates of heavy metals much higher than the standards. Southern was sentenced in
2015 (8 years after the fact and in middle of conflict for the Tia Maria
project) to pay an amount of one million dollars, also, the judgment mentioned
a prison sentence of 2 years against its president (link
), yet, his political supports allowed him to avoid the sentence (link).
Southern refining plant in Ilo
Since the
beginning of its activities in Peru the company has already been convicted fifteen
times per serious environmental liabilities, but the most serious is the
destruction of agriculture by the water depletion and pollution. In fact, large-scale mining
requires astronomical amounts of good quality water, the region of Arequipa is
a dry region (see satellite images) that depends entirely on the Andean
aquifers.
The Southern
two mines producen more than 300,000 tons of copper per year, which implies a
consumption of about 60 million m3 of water per year (2 m3 per second) as
minimum. Such consumption in a region that is already in water stress, is a
total madness; Southern is already responsible for the decline of agricultural
activities in the valleys of the region of Mocquegua. The decrease in river
flows also causes a concentration of pollutants linked to the enormous quantities
of mining waste (tailings) (about 900 million tons per year), which generates
Southern.
This problem
of water shortage makes that agriculture is increasingly difficult, this
problem associated with environmental pollution and the consequences on human
health related to mining are the main components of the conflict. Do not forget
that a fourth project of the same kind is under negotiation in the region, it
is the Quellaveco project and it could begin in the next two years (depending
on negotiations between Southern and Anglo American).
Conclusion
The Peruvian government concepts on
democracy.
First, we
must examine the concepts of democracy currently in application in Peru, since
his election in 2011, the government of Ollanta Humala has strengthened in a
incredible way the tools of repression, including through the adoption of
legislation such as the law No 30151 of January 13, 2014 that exempts policemen
from criminal responsibility even if these policemen cause serious injury or
death during their operations. The 214 social conflicts that have marked the
government of Ollanta Humala caused the death of 57 peoples, of these 214
social conflicts, 118 are strictly socio-environmental conflicts and caused
most of these 57 deaths (over 40).
Also, think
in real democratic will of a government, which officially used 3 times the
state of emergency (Cajamarca in 2011 and 2012 Islay in 2015) and also used it,
informally in 7 departments (Apurimac, Ayacucho, Cajamarca, Cusco, Moquegua,
Puno and Tacna) with the resolution No. 118-2015-IN of May 26, 2015.
Also we
remember that the Peruvian government declared that it would not implement neither
of the precautionary measures requested by the Inter-American Commission on
Human Rights (CIDH), precautionary measures for the opponents of the mining
project Conga, decisions issued in 2014 and 2015 respectively and that are
available at the following link (records
MC 452/11 and MC 530/14).
Finally,
strange conception of democracy, when a government criminalize people who
protest against the projects imposed by force, when democratically elected
mayors and regional presidents are sent to jail, because they have the bad idea
to disapprove the will of the central government
The concepts of the Peruvian
government in environmental matters
You can also
consider the attitude, at least strange, of the Peruvian government on the
issue of environment, a government that hosted the World Climate Conference,
the COP20 in December 2014, and has never spared his efforts to remove all
legal barriers against environmental destruction, including multiple
"paquetazos" (name given to these "packages" of measures to
encourage investment) issued by the Peruvian government in 2014 (Law 30230)
and 2015 (ley 3941) which totally ignore people living in the concessions, that
do not take into account the environmental destruction and the health
protection and reduce the environmental impact studies (EIA) of the projects to
mere formalities.
Note that
these packages of measures violate the rights of indigenous peoples, including
No. 169 ILO Convention that Peru ratified in 1994 and the 2007 Declaration of
the UN on the rights of native peoples. Finally, these measures do not comply
with the UN Declaration of 2010 on the rights to water and sanitation and the
constitutional rights of the Peruvian people to a healthy and unpolluted
environment.
From the COP20 to the cop21, from
Peru to France.
Although the three
visits that President Humala made to France since his election have gone
virtually unnoticed in the French press, relations between France and Peru are
apparently rosy. Moreover President François Hollande himself had planned to
travel to Peru in January 2015, but that trip was frustrated by the terrorist
attacks in Paris in this month of January.
The Peruvian president Ollanta Humala and the French president François
Hollande
If French
companies are not directly involved in mining, they are indirectly through
engineering and services and in particular large dam projects (especially for
feeding mining with energy ). French multinationals are very present in the
field of oil exploitation in the Amazon (Perenco, Maurel & Prom). But most
significant is the collaboration between police forces and the French
gendarmerie, cooperation began in 2012 and includes training services and weapon
sales and even helicopters (France sold 5 EC145 in 2012).
Training and
arms sales to police forces who are totaly exempted of prosecution and who does not
hesitate to use firearms in their operations of protesters’ repression.
But François
Hollande does not pose such questions, moreover, also received the President of
Mexico, Enrique Peña Nieto, as guest of honor at the celebrations of the French
national day this July 14, 2015. Coincidence, President Humala received and
honored President Peña Nieto in Lima on July 2, probably, Francois Hollande and
Enrique Peña Nieto had other topics of conversation that the 43 students of the
normal school Ayotzinapa who disappeared 10 months ago and the other thousands
of killed and disappeared in Mexico.
The presidents of Mexico Enrique Peña Nieto and Peru
Ollanta Humala Tasso
Strange, but
where are the goals for the COP21? For now, there is still another analogy with
Peru, as the COP20 in Lima, the COP21 in
Paris will be held behind closed doors in an isolated spot (Le Bourget), where
only duly accredited persons shall be admitted for UNFCCC (UN Framework
Convention on Climate Change). There will be no banners or untimely boisterous
demonstrators, only well-dressed ladies and gentlemen and
"handpicked" people, a meeting of "gentlemen".
While "gentemen" are preparing to quietly discuss climate change in Paris, at 11000 km from Paris, small farmers, both North and South of Peru, continue to struggle with courage and determination to survive against a government that wants to remove them and replace them with a much more profitable activity in the short term, but that has no future. This brave and unequal struggle, it is our duty to support it and make it known, as farmers of Cajamarca or Tambo Valley do not contribute to global warming, unlike the destructive extractive model that the Peruvian government is trying to impose by force.
While "gentemen" are preparing to quietly discuss climate change in Paris, at 11000 km from Paris, small farmers, both North and South of Peru, continue to struggle with courage and determination to survive against a government that wants to remove them and replace them with a much more profitable activity in the short term, but that has no future. This brave and unequal struggle, it is our duty to support it and make it known, as farmers of Cajamarca or Tambo Valley do not contribute to global warming, unlike the destructive extractive model that the Peruvian government is trying to impose by force.
¡CONGA NO VA – TIA MARIA TAMPOCO!
Aucun commentaire:
Enregistrer un commentaire